Swarovski Name Change

About 2 weeks ago, one of my bead suppliers informed its customers that Swarovski had changed the name of its crystal components.  From now on, crystal beads and pendants sold by Swarovski would no longer be called Swarovski, but rather Crystallized – Swarovski Elements, or just Crystallized for short.  Only the completed pieces sold directly by the company are to be called Swarovski crystals.

So by Swarovski rules, when I buy crystal beads made by them, I am buying Crytallized and I when I list what components I used to make a piece I am to list them as Crystallized. 

Wow!  What a bad business idea! (in my humble opinion)

I thought companies wanted name recognition!  Especially when the name is associated with luxury, elegance and conveys status. 

At the moment, people pay a premium to buy pieces made with Swarovski crystals.  Do you think they will pay a premium price to buy a piece made with Crystallized crystals?  Do you think those that make jewelry will want to pay a premium price to buy crystal beads called Crystallized if their customers don’t make the association with Swarovski and don’t want to pay premium price?  Will anyone actually list them as Crystallized – Swarovski Elements in their description?  The whole cachet of Swarovski is just not there with Crystallized!

And could they have picked a more generic name?!  Crystallized?!  I was in a Michael’s store about a week ago, looking for scrap-booking paper and happened to walk by a crystal bead display.  I saw Crystallized on the packaging and thought “Wow! they have totally re-branded their look!” And not in a good way…  And then I looked more closely and saw it said Crystallazzi…  So not the Swarovski stuff, but easily mistaken for their new name.

So two weeks later, I’m still amazed, (and somewhat aghast) that Swarovski was willing to just throw away their name like that for a part of their business.  In an age when so many companies are going through branding exercises and trying to achieve international name recognition, Swarovski just walks away from a name with high recognition factor and that conveys a sense of status.  And they did so for one of the most generic names I could have imagined for a company sellings  crystal components. 

What were they thinking?

5 thoughts on “Swarovski Name Change

  1. I agree with thisnorthengirl my clients love when I mention the name Swarovski, do you think we could list our pieces as “Crystallized by Swarovski” something like that, tell me what you think.

    • Personally, I still use “Swarovski” otherwise my clients don’t know what it is. Swarovski is familiar and reassures them.

  2. I am absolutely appalled at what the company is doing to simply “shrug off” a name which actually in the minds of most peaple, ONLY means Crystal of the HIGHEST QUALITY, COLOR AND CLARITY

    I am a retired woman with many years of experience in the fashion world and with the use of Swarovski crystal beads and jewelry. This is a super-sized mistake in my view, for the company to make.

  3. I agree with all the responses before mine. What an outrageous idea. What were they thinking? It’s true that when people hear the name Swarovski they know they’re purchasing the best quality in crystals. I guess we’ll just have to use the full name so that we can include the Swarovski name in the description. I’m hoping the company becomes aware of the complaints and change their minds.

  4. What in the world is Swarovski thinking? Why would they want to be called just crystallized? I just don’t get it. If you make jewelry when you told people the stones were Swarovski then they knew they were going to be paying more for the item, because of the name. I guess we will just have to continue to say the beads we are using are Swarovski, because they are!!! Ellen

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s